vincii we show the working

← Industrials

ICTSF

ICTS International N V

Industrials · fiscal year ending 2024-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 0/2
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Owner earnings$-3.81mpositive
Return on equitymedian 11.7%
Debt to equitymedian 0.79x
Operating margin-1.2%median 15.0%

Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Terry Smith 0/1
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Return on capital employedmedian 10.1%
Cash conversionmedian 1.78x
Operating margin-1.2%median 15.0%
Debt to equitymedian 0.79x

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Charlie Munger 0/1
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Return on capital employedmedian 10.1%
Return on equitymedian 11.7%
Operating margin-1.2%median 15.0%

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Philip Fisher 0/3
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Operating margin-1.2%median 15.0%
Net margin-0.9%median 10.2%
Return on capital employedmedian 10.1%
Operating margin, held or improving-3.3%10-yr median 1.4%

Passes 0 of 3. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Walter Schloss 1/1
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Current ratio2.04xmedian 1.25x
Debt to equitymedian 0.79x

Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 1/2
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Current ratio2.04x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running0 yrs10 published

Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 0/1
MeasureICTSFChecked against
Debt to equitymedian 0.79x
Net margin-0.9%median 10.2%

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about ICTS International N V. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Last usable year: 2024-12-31 — 20 months ago. Nothing filed since gives the figures a payout ratio needs. For a company that once paid, that usually means it stopped.
BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earningsnegative
why
Lost $0.110 per share — no earnings to pay from.
Operating cash flownegative
why
Operations consumed $9.47m of cash.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $11.4m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately — no basis produces a ratio. Earnings, operating cash flow and free cash flow are all negative, so there is no denominator to divide the dividend by. That is not a gap in the data; it is the answer. The dividend was funded from something other than the money the business made this year — borrowing, cash on hand, or asset sales — and the filing will say which.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.

Caveats on this company


Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.

Also on: when it files.

When this changes

Every figure above is recomputed whenever ICTS International N V files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.

Get the letter →