vincii we show the working

← Materials

MDU

MDU Resources Group

Materials · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 1/4
MeasureMDUChecked against
Owner earnings$-373.29mpositive
Return on equity6.9%median 11.7%
Debt to equity0.97xmedian 0.79x
Operating margin15.6%median 15.0%

Passes 1 of 4. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Terry Smith 2/4
MeasureMDUChecked against
Return on capital employed5.3%median 10.1%
Cash conversion2.49xmedian 1.78x
Operating margin15.6%median 15.0%
Debt to equity0.97xmedian 0.79x

Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Charlie Munger 1/3
MeasureMDUChecked against
Return on capital employed5.3%median 10.1%
Return on equity6.9%median 11.7%
Operating margin15.6%median 15.0%

Passes 1 of 3. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Chuck Akre 1/4
MeasureMDUChecked against
Return on equity6.9%median 11.7%
Debt to equity0.97xmedian 0.79x
Cash conversion2.49xmedian 1.78x
Return on equity, sustained3 of 108 of 10 above median

Passes 1 of 4. To be clear: Chuck Akre has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Philip Fisher 2/4
MeasureMDUChecked against
Operating margin15.6%median 15.0%
Net margin10.2%median 10.2%
Return on capital employed5.3%median 10.1%
Operating margin, held or improving15.6%10-yr median 9.8%

Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Walter Schloss 0/2
MeasureMDUChecked against
Current ratio0.84xmedian 1.25x
Debt to equity0.97xmedian 0.79x

Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/2
MeasureMDUChecked against
Current ratio0.84x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running9 yrs10 published

Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 0/1
MeasureMDUChecked against
Return on capital employed5.3%median 10.1%

Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Joel Greenblatt has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 0/2
MeasureMDUChecked against
Debt to equity0.97xmedian 0.79x
Net margin10.2%median 10.2%

Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about MDU Resources Group. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings58.1%
why
A single year's earnings for a commodity producer can be several times the through-cycle average. This ratio computed in a trough looks alarming and in a peak looks trivial; neither describes whether the dividend is affordable across a cycle.
Operating cash flow22.9%
why
Before capital spending.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $297m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.

Spread between highest and lowest: 35.2 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 6 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing 3/50Direction 0/30Stability 3/20

Against its own history: 262.2% this year vs 114.3% median over the prior 5. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2022-12-31262.2%
2020-12-3179.1%
2017-12-31141.4%
2016-12-31198.8%
2015-12-31114.3%
2014-12-3186.7%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 79.1% to 262.2%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

6% of the 36 materials here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.


Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.

Also on: rated not covered · when it files.

When this changes

Every figure above is recomputed whenever MDU Resources Group files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.

Get the letter →