vincii we show the working

← Consumer discretionary

QSP

Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership

Consumer discretionary · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 3/4
MeasureQSPChecked against
Owner earnings$1.11bnpositive
Return on equity20.8%median 11.7%
Debt to equity2.57xmedian 0.79x
Operating margin23.3%median 15.0%

Passes 3 of 4. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Terry Smith 2/4
MeasureQSPChecked against
Return on capital employed11.9%median 10.1%
Cash conversion1.59xmedian 1.78x
Operating margin23.3%median 15.0%
Debt to equity2.57xmedian 0.79x

Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Charlie Munger 3/3
MeasureQSPChecked against
Return on capital employed11.9%median 10.1%
Return on equity20.8%median 11.7%
Operating margin23.3%median 15.0%

Passes 3 of 3. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Chuck Akre 2/4
MeasureQSPChecked against
Return on equity20.8%median 11.7%
Debt to equity2.57xmedian 0.79x
Cash conversion1.59xmedian 1.78x
Return on equity, sustained10 of 108 of 10 above median

Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Chuck Akre has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Philip Fisher 3/4
MeasureQSPChecked against
Operating margin23.3%median 15.0%
Net margin11.4%median 10.2%
Return on capital employed11.9%median 10.1%
Operating margin, held or improving23.3%10-yr median 29.2%

Passes 3 of 4. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Walter Schloss 0/2
MeasureQSPChecked against
Current ratio0.98xmedian 1.25x
Debt to equity2.57xmedian 0.79x

Passes 0 of 2. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 1/2
MeasureQSPChecked against
Current ratio0.98x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running10 yrs10 published

Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureQSPChecked against
Return on capital employed11.9%median 10.1%

Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Joel Greenblatt has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 1/2
MeasureQSPChecked against
Debt to equity2.57xmedian 0.79x
Net margin11.4%median 10.2%

Passes 1 of 2. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
Operating cash flow64.6%
why
Before capital spending.
Free cash flow 76.5%
why
After maintaining the business.
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.

Spread between highest and lowest: 11.8 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 45 / 100 — Tight. ? Peer standing 7/50Direction 25/30Stability 13/20

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2025-12-3176.5%
2024-12-3179.0%
2023-12-3182.3%
2022-12-3169.9%
2021-12-3160.1%
2020-12-31119.3%

14% of the 44 consumer discretionary here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.


Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.

What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: rated tight · when it files.

When this changes

Every figure above is recomputed whenever Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.

Get the letter →