U-Haul Holding
Through the investors’ lenses
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 1/3
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $-1.07bn | positive | ✗ |
| Return on equity | 14.2% | median 11.7% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | 0.94x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | — | median 15.0% | — |
Passes 1 of 3. To be clear: Warren Buffett has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Terry Smith 2/3
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 11.4% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Cash conversion | 1.87x | median 1.78x | ✓ |
| Operating margin | — | median 15.0% | — |
| Debt to equity | 0.94x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
Passes 2 of 3. To be clear: Terry Smith has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Charlie Munger 2/2
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 11.4% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
| Return on equity | 14.2% | median 11.7% | ✓ |
| Operating margin | — | median 15.0% | — |
Passes 2 of 2. To be clear: Charlie Munger has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Chuck Akre 2/4
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on equity | 14.2% | median 11.7% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | 0.94x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
| Cash conversion | 1.87x | median 1.78x | ✓ |
| Return on equity, sustained | 5 of 10 | 8 of 10 above median | ✗ |
Passes 2 of 4. To be clear: Chuck Akre has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Philip Fisher 1/1
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | — | median 15.0% | — |
| Net margin | — | median 10.2% | — |
| Return on capital employed | 11.4% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Philip Fisher has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Walter Schloss 0/1
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | — | median 1.25x | — |
| Debt to equity | 0.94x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Walter Schloss has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 1/1
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | — | 2.00x published | — |
| Long-term debt to working capital | — | 1.00x published | — |
| Positive earnings, ten years running | 10 yrs | 10 published | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Benjamin Graham has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 1/1
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 11.4% | median 10.1% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. To be clear: Joel Greenblatt has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 0/1
| Measure | UHAL | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | 0.94x | median 0.79x | ✗ |
| Net margin | — | median 10.2% | — |
Passes 0 of 1. To be clear: Peter Lynch has never said anything about U-Haul Holding. These are the company’s own figures put through the tests he described. What he looks at, and why →
Last usable year: 2023-03-31 — 41 months ago. Nothing filed since gives the figures a payout ratio needs. For a company that once paid, that usually means it stopped.
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 1.1% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | negative | whyOCF fell $994m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow. |
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.
Coverage rating 17 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing 7/50Direction 0/30Stability 10/20
Free cash flow payout, last 2 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2021-03-31 | 52.2% |
| 2012-03-31 | 24.3% |
15% of the 74 industrials here pay out more — at the demanding end.
The arithmetic
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $19.6m ÷ operating cash flow $1,730m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $19.6m ÷ (operating cash flow $1,730m − capex $2,724m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2025-05-29 · accession 0000950170-25-078451
- 10-K filed 2024-05-30 · accession
0000950170-24-066736 - 10-K filed 2023-06-02 · accession
0000004457-23-000052
All public at sec.gov — you should not have to take our word for it.
Computed straight from SEC XBRL. A number that looks wrong to you is more useful to us than agreement — tell us.
Also on: rated not covered · when it files.
When this changes
Every figure above is recomputed whenever U-Haul Holding files. The monthly letter carries what filed, what moved, and one finding computed across every company here.