showing the working

← Energy

HCC

Warrior Met Coal

Energy · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings29.6%
why
Swings with the commodity price, not the business.
Operating cash flow7.8%
why
Before capital spending.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $91.0m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.

Spread between highest and lowest: 21.9 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 63 / 100 — Adequate. ? Peer standing 33/50Direction 30/30Stability 0/20

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2023-12-3129.2%
2022-12-3112.5%
2021-12-313.6%
2020-12-3141.4%
2019-12-3156.5%
2018-12-3178.8%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 12.5% to 29.2%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

67% of the 33 energy here pay out more.

The arithmetic

  • GAAP earnings — dividends declared per share $0.320 ÷ diluted EPS $1.08
  • Operating cash flow — dividends paid $17.8m ÷ operating cash flow $229m
  • Free cash flow — dividends paid $17.8m ÷ (operating cash flow $229m − capex $320m)

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Warrior Met Coal’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules two investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →