showing the working

← Consumer discretionary

AAP

Advance Auto Parts

Consumer discretionary · fiscal year ending 2026-01-03

Through the investors’ lenses

0 of 4 cleared1 of 10 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 1/4
MeasureAAPChecked against
Owner earnings$64.00mpositive
Return on equity2.0%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity1.55xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin-0.5%US median 3.1%

Passes 1 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Advance Auto Parts’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/3
MeasureAAPChecked against
Current ratio1.75x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.10x1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running1 yr10 published

Passes 0 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Advance Auto Parts’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 0/1
MeasureAAPChecked against
Return on capital employed-0.8%US median 5.1%

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Advance Auto Parts’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 0/2
MeasureAAPChecked against
Debt to equity1.55xUS median 0.57x
Net margin0.5%US median 2.0%

Passes 0 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Advance Auto Parts’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings137.0%
why
The figure most screeners publish.
Operating cash flownegative
why
Operations consumed $46.0m of cash.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $298m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.

Coverage rating 1 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing 1/50Direction 0/30Stability 0/20

Against its own history: 342.6% this year vs 8.0% median over the prior 5. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2023-12-30342.6%
2022-12-3199.5%
2022-01-0119.7%
2021-01-028.0%
2019-12-282.9%
2018-12-292.9%
Coverage has deteriorated three years running — 8.0% to 342.6% — and the dividend now exceeds what the basis that applies can fund.

2% of the 62 consumer discretionary here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

Also on: rated not covered · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Advance Auto Parts’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.