AGNT
Through the investors’ lenses
0 of 3 cleared0 of 6 criteria
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 0/3
| Measure | AGNT | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $-25.41m | positive | ✗ |
| Return on equity | -9.4% | US median 2.8% | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | — | US median 0.57x | — |
| Operating margin | -0.4% | US median 3.1% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 3. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to AGNT’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 0/2
| Measure | AGNT | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 1.53x | 2.00x published | ✗ |
| Long-term debt to working capital | — | 1.00x published | — |
| Positive earnings, ten years running | 0 yrs | 10 published | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 2. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to AGNT’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 0/1
| Measure | AGNT | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | — | US median 0.57x | — |
| Net margin | -0.5% | US median 2.0% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to AGNT’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
This company is not classified. The SEC files it under SIC 6531, a catch-all that covers businesses with little in common. No sector-specific rule is applied, so the general basis for an operating company — free cash flow — is used. Read the comparison below rather than the single marked figure.
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| GAAP earnings | negative | whyLost $0.140 per share — no earnings to pay from. |
| Operating cash flow | 25.9% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | 28.2% | whyAfter maintaining the business. |
Spread between highest and lowest: 2.3 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.
Coverage rating 8 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing · not rankedDirection 4/30Stability 0/20
Against its own history: 28.2% this year vs 13.3% median over the prior 4. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.
Free cash flow payout, last 5 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 28.2% |
| 2024-12-31 | 16.3% |
| 2023-12-31 | 14.0% |
| 2022-12-31 | 12.7% |
| 2021-12-31 | 4.9% |
Coverage has deteriorated three years running, 12.7% to 28.2%. Still covered, but moving the wrong way.
The arithmetic
- GAAP earnings — dividends declared per share $0.0500 ÷ diluted EPS $-0.140
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $30.8m ÷ operating cash flow $119m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $30.8m ÷ (operating cash flow $119m − capex $9.57m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-02-24 · accession 0001104659-26-019145
Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.
Caveats on this company
- DPS $0.05 filed as paid, but dividends paid imply $0.20 — one of the two underlying facts is wrong. The filed per-share figure is used.
Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.
What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated not covered · when it files.
Who else looks like this
Every figure above is computed from AGNT’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.
A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one document — what that adds.