Angel Oak Mortgage REIT
Through the investors’ lenses
0 of 3 cleared3 of 6 criteria
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 2/3
| Measure | AOMR | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | — | positive | — |
| Return on equity | 16.5% | US median 2.8% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | 8.51x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | 31.0% | US median 3.1% | ✓ |
Passes 2 of 3. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Angel Oak Mortgage REIT’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 0/1
| Measure | AOMR | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 1.8% | US median 5.1% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Angel Oak Mortgage REIT’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 1/2
| Measure | AOMR | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | 8.51x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Net margin | 30.6% | US median 2.0% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Angel Oak Mortgage REIT’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| GAAP earnings | 70.7% | whyDepressed by depreciation on buildings that are not losing value. |
| Operating cash flow | negative | whyOperations consumed $407m of cash. |
| Funds from operations | 70.4% | whyThe industry's basis — adds that depreciation back. |
No free cash flow figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.
All bases agree, within a point.
Coverage rating 62 / 100 — Adequate. ? Peer standing 37/50Direction 15/30Stability 10/20
The arithmetic
- GAAP earnings — dividends declared per share $1.27 ÷ diluted EPS $1.80
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $30.9m ÷ operating cash flow $-407m
- Funds from operations — dividends declared per share $1.27 ÷ derived FFO $1.81 per share
- FFO built NAREIT-style: net income, plus real-estate depreciation, less gains on sale, over weighted-average diluted shares
- This is an approximation. Every REIT defines its own adjusted variant in the filing text, so it will not match the earnings release exactly
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-03-03 · accession 0001766478-26-000002
Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.
Caveats on this company
- DPS derived from dividends paid ($1.27); no per-share tag filed
- FFO derived (NAREIT approximation)
Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.
What the funds from operations payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated adequate · when it files.
Who else looks like this
Every figure above is computed from Angel Oak Mortgage REIT’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.
A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one document — what that adds.