showing the working

← Industrials

AVT

Avnet

Industrials · fiscal year ending 2026-06-27

Through the investors’ lenses

1 of 4 cleared4 of 10 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 2/4
MeasureAVTChecked against
Owner earnings$337.60mpositive
Return on equity6.7%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity0.64xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin2.6%US median 3.1%

Passes 2 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Avnet’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 1/3
MeasureAVTChecked against
Current ratio1.78x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital0.43x1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running6 yrs10 published

Passes 1 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Avnet’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureAVTChecked against
Return on capital employed8.8%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Avnet’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 0/2
MeasureAVTChecked against
Debt to equity0.64xUS median 0.57x
Net margin1.2%US median 2.0%

Passes 0 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Avnet’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings34.9%
why
The figure most screeners publish.
Operating cash flownegative
why
Operations consumed $281m of cash.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $354m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.

Coverage rating 58 / 100 — Tight. ? Peer standing 33/50Direction 25/30Stability 0/20

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2025-06-2819.6%
2024-06-2924.2%
2021-07-03207.7%
2020-06-2712.8%
2019-06-2921.2%
2018-06-3090.4%

66% of the 118 industrials here pay out more.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

Also on: rated tight · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Avnet’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.