showing the working

← Real estate

CSR

Centerspace

Real estate · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

0 of 4 cleared3 of 8 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 2/4
MeasureCSRChecked against
Owner earnings$97.58mpositive
Return on equity2.4%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity1.42xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin23.6%US median 3.1%

Passes 2 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Centerspace’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/1
MeasureCSRChecked against
Current ratio2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running1 yr10 published

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Centerspace’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 0/1
MeasureCSRChecked against
Return on capital employed3.7%US median 5.1%

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Centerspace’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 1/2
MeasureCSRChecked against
Debt to equity1.42xUS median 0.57x
Net margin6.2%US median 2.0%

Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Centerspace’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings302.0%
why
Depressed by depreciation on buildings that are not losing value.
Operating cash flow51.9%
why
Before capital spending.
Free cash flow79.4%
why
Counts property acquisitions as though they were maintenance.
Funds from operations 98.8%
why
The industry's basis — adds that depreciation back.

Spread between highest and lowest: 250.1 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 30 / 100 — Strained. ? Peer standing 19/50Direction 0/30Stability 11/20

Against its own history: 98.8% this year vs 59.8% median over the prior 5. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.

Funds from operations payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2025-12-3198.8%
2024-12-3148.0%
2023-12-3168.2%
2022-12-3148.3%
2021-12-3159.8%
2020-12-3163.3%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 48.0% to 98.8%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

38% of the 47 real estate here pay out more.

The arithmetic

- FFO built NAREIT-style: net income, plus real-estate depreciation, less gains on sale, over weighted-average diluted shares

- This is an approximation. Every REIT defines its own adjusted variant in the filing text, so it will not match the earnings release exactly

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.

Caveats on this company


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

What the funds from operations payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: uncovered on earnings, covered on the basis that applies · rated strained · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Centerspace’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.