Camping World Holdings
Through the investors’ lenses
1 of 4 cleared1 of 10 criteria
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 0/4
| Measure | CWH | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $-246.75m | positive | ✗ |
| Return on equity | -39.3% | US median 2.8% | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | 6.44x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | US median 3.1% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Camping World Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 0/3
| Measure | CWH | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 1.20x | 2.00x published | ✗ |
| Long-term debt to working capital | 3.25x | 1.00x published | ✗ |
| Positive earnings, ten years running | 0 yrs | 10 published | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Camping World Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 1/1
| Measure | CWH | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 10.6% | US median 5.1% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Camping World Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 0/2
| Measure | CWH | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | 6.44x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Net margin | -1.4% | US median 2.0% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Camping World Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | negative | whyOperations consumed $132m of cash. |
| Free cash flow | negative | whyOCF fell $384m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow. |
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately — no basis produces a ratio. Earnings, operating cash flow and free cash flow are all negative, so there is no denominator to divide the dividend by. That is not a gap in the data; it is the answer. The dividend was funded from something other than the money the business made this year — borrowing, cash on hand, or asset sales — and the filing will say which.
Coverage rating 53 / 100 — Tight. ? Peer standing 43/50Direction 10/30Stability 0/20
Free cash flow payout, last 5 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2024-12-31 | 17.1% |
| 2023-12-31 | 59.4% |
| 2020-12-31 | 9.2% |
| 2019-12-31 | 14.0% |
| 2016-12-31 | 1.0% |
85% of the 62 consumer discretionary here pay out more — comfortable for the sector.
The arithmetic
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $31.4m ÷ operating cash flow $-132m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $31.4m ÷ (operating cash flow $-132m − capex $252m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-02-27 · accession 0001104659-26-021548
Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.
Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.
Also on: rated tight · when it files.
Who else looks like this
Every figure above is computed from Camping World Holdings’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.
A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one document — what that adds.