showing the working

← Materials

FSI

Flexible Solutions International

Materials · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

3 of 4 cleared8 of 10 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 2/4
MeasureFSIChecked against
Owner earnings$-1.62mpositive
Return on equity2.0%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity0.11xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin11.9%US median 3.1%

Passes 2 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Flexible Solutions International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 3/3
MeasureFSIChecked against
Current ratio3.06x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital0.18x1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running10 yrs10 published

Passes 3 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Flexible Solutions International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureFSIChecked against
Return on capital employed10.6%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Flexible Solutions International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 2/2
MeasureFSIChecked against
Debt to equity0.11xUS median 0.57x
Net margin2.0%US median 2.0%

Passes 2 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Flexible Solutions International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings156.3%
why
A single year's earnings for a commodity producer can be several times the through-cycle average. This ratio computed in a trough looks alarming and in a peak looks trivial; neither describes whether the dividend is affordable across a cycle.
Operating cash flow33.7%
why
Before capital spending.
Free cash flownegative
why
Operating cash flow was $592k short of capital spending, so no ratio exists. The dividend was not funded from free cash flow this year.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.

Spread between highest and lowest: 122.6 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 32 / 100 — Strained. ? Peer standing 2/50Direction 30/30Stability 0/20

Free cash flow payout, last 3 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2024-12-31207.9%
2023-12-3155.7%
2019-12-31445.2%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 55.7% to 207.9%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

4% of the 47 materials here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.

Caveats on this company


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

Also on: rated strained · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Flexible Solutions International’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.