showing the working

← Industrials

GEF

Greif

Industrials · fiscal year ending 2024-10-31

Through the investors’ lenses

1 of 4 cleared6 of 10 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 3/4
MeasureGEFChecked against
Owner earnings$343.60mpositive
Return on equity12.9%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity1.31xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin8.5%US median 3.1%

Passes 3 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Greif’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 1/3
MeasureGEFChecked against
Current ratio1.53x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital4.91x1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running10 yrs10 published

Passes 1 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Greif’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureGEFChecked against
Return on capital employed9.7%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Greif’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 1/2
MeasureGEFChecked against
Debt to equity1.31xUS median 0.57x
Net margin4.9%US median 2.0%

Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Greif’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Last usable year: 2024-10-31 — 22 months ago. Nothing filed since gives the figures a payout ratio needs. For a company that once paid, that usually means it stopped.
BasisPayoutWhy
Operating cash flow34.0%
why
Before capital spending.
Free cash flow 71.4%
why
After maintaining the business.
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.

Spread between highest and lowest: 37.4 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 8 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing 3/50Direction 0/30Stability 5/20

Against its own history: 71.4% this year vs 32.3% median over the prior 5. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2024-10-3171.4%
2023-10-3126.7%
2022-10-3123.1%
2021-10-3141.4%
2020-10-3132.3%
2019-10-3144.7%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 26.7% to 71.4%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

6% of the 118 industrials here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: rated not covered · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Greif’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.