Netstreit
Through the investors’ lenses
0 of 3 cleared3 of 7 criteria
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 2/4
| Measure | NTST | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $86.41m | positive | ✓ |
| Return on equity | 0.5% | US median 2.8% | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | 0.76x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | US median 3.1% | ✓ |
Passes 2 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Netstreit’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 0/1
| Measure | NTST | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 0.3% | US median 5.1% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Netstreit’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 1/2
| Measure | NTST | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | 0.76x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Net margin | 3.6% | US median 2.0% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Netstreit’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 64.1% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | 68.4% | whyCounts property acquisitions as though they were maintenance. |
| Funds from operations | 83.6% | whyThe industry's basis — adds that depreciation back. |
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.
Spread between highest and lowest: 19.5 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.
Coverage rating 54 / 100 — Tight. ? Peer standing 28/50Direction 10/30Stability 16/20
Funds from operations payout, last 6 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 83.6% |
| 2024-12-31 | 100.8% |
| 2023-12-31 | 75.5% |
| 2022-12-31 | 74.5% |
| 2021-12-31 | 99.9% |
| 2020-12-31 | 67.1% |
55% of the 47 real estate here pay out more.
The arithmetic
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $70.2m ÷ operating cash flow $110m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $70.2m ÷ (operating cash flow $110m − capex $6.90m)
- Funds from operations — dividends declared per share $0.850 ÷ derived FFO $1.02 per share
- FFO built NAREIT-style: net income, plus real-estate depreciation, less gains on sale, over weighted-average diluted shares
- This is an approximation. Every REIT defines its own adjusted variant in the filing text, so it will not match the earnings release exactly
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-02-10 · accession 0001628280-26-006901
Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.
Caveats on this company
- FFO derived (NAREIT approximation)
- basis discarded as outside the sane band (distribution far larger than the year's income — usually a special dividend or a return of capital, not a payout ratio): earnings
Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.
What the funds from operations payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated tight · when it files.
Who else looks like this
Every figure above is computed from Netstreit’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.
A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one document — what that adds.