showing the working

← Real estate

SAFE

Safehold

Real estate · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

0 of 4 cleared3 of 7 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 2/3
MeasureSAFEChecked against
Owner earningspositive
Return on equity4.8%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity1.90xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin26.2%US median 3.1%

Passes 2 of 3. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Safehold’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/1
MeasureSAFEChecked against
Current ratio2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running2 yrs10 published

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Safehold’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 0/1
MeasureSAFEChecked against
Return on capital employed1.4%US median 5.1%

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Safehold’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 1/2
MeasureSAFEChecked against
Debt to equity1.90xUS median 0.57x
Net margin29.7%US median 2.0%

Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Safehold’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings44.5%
why
Depressed by depreciation on buildings that are not losing value.
Operating cash flow106.5%
why
Absorbs working-capital swings that earnings do not.
Funds from operations 41.3%
why
The industry's basis — adds that depreciation back.
No free cash flow figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.

Spread between highest and lowest: 65.2 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 65 / 100 — Adequate. ? Peer standing 47/50Direction 18/30Stability 0/20

Funds from operations payout, last 5 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2025-12-3141.3%
2024-12-3143.7%
2021-12-3135.0%
2020-12-31348.7%
2019-12-316.8%

94% of the 47 real estate here pay out more — comfortable for the sector.

The arithmetic

- FFO built NAREIT-style: net income, plus real-estate depreciation, less gains on sale, over weighted-average diluted shares

- This is an approximation. Every REIT defines its own adjusted variant in the filing text, so it will not match the earnings release exactly

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.

Caveats on this company


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

What the funds from operations payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: rated adequate · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Safehold’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.