showing the working

← Materials

SXT

Sensient Technologies

Materials · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

2 of 4 cleared8 of 10 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 3/4
MeasureSXTChecked against
Owner earnings$106.18mpositive
Return on equity11.3%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity0.59xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin12.8%US median 3.1%

Passes 3 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Sensient Technologies’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 3/3
MeasureSXTChecked against
Current ratio4.10x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital0.87x1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running10 yrs10 published

Passes 3 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Sensient Technologies’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureSXTChecked against
Return on capital employed10.9%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Sensient Technologies’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 1/2
MeasureSXTChecked against
Debt to equity0.59xUS median 0.57x
Net margin8.3%US median 2.0%

Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Sensient Technologies’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings51.9%
why
A single year's earnings for a commodity producer can be several times the through-cycle average. This ratio computed in a trough looks alarming and in a peak looks trivial; neither describes whether the dividend is affordable across a cycle.
Operating cash flow54.5%
why
Absorbs working-capital swings that earnings do not.
Free cash flow 181.2%
why
Nets out the capital spending producers cut in downturns — so it flatters a trough year.

Spread between highest and lowest: 129.3 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.

Coverage rating 2 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing 2/50Direction 0/30Stability 0/20

Against its own history: 181.2% this year vs 70.9% median over the prior 5. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2025-12-31181.2%
2024-12-3170.9%
2023-12-3184.6%
2021-12-3179.0%
2020-12-3139.6%
2019-12-3145.0%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 70.9% to 181.2%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

4% of the 47 materials here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: covered on earnings, not on the basis that applies · rated not covered · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Sensient Technologies’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.