showing the working

← Financial services

VRTS

Virtus Investment Partners

Financial services · fiscal year ending 2025-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

4 of 4 cleared8 of 8 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 4/4
MeasureVRTSChecked against
Owner earnings$192.72mpositive
Return on equity14.6%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity0.42xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin19.8%US median 3.1%

Passes 4 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Virtus Investment Partners’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 1/1
MeasureVRTSChecked against
Current ratio2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running10 yrs10 published

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Virtus Investment Partners’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureVRTSChecked against
Return on capital employed12.7%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Virtus Investment Partners’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 2/2
MeasureVRTSChecked against
Debt to equity0.42xUS median 0.57x
Net margin15.9%US median 2.0%

Passes 2 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Virtus Investment Partners’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earnings46.6%
why
The figure most screeners publish.
Operating cash flownegative
why
Operations consumed $67.2m of cash.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $74.1m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately. The basis that governs here is free cash flow, and this year it yields no ratio at all. The figure above is shown for completeness; treating it as the answer is the substitution this page exists to prevent.

Coverage rating 56 / 100 — Tight. ? Peer standing 26/50Direction 30/30Stability 0/20

Free cash flow payout, last 4 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2023-12-3122.8%
2022-12-3137.5%
2021-12-314.8%
2016-12-3172.9%

53% of the 34 financial services here pay out more.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

Also on: rated tight · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Virtus Investment Partners’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.