Concrete Pumping Holdings
Through the investors’ lenses
1 of 4 cleared4 of 9 criteria
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 2/4
| Measure | BBCP | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $13.13m | positive | ✓ |
| Return on equity | 2.4% | US median 2.8% | ✗ |
| Debt to equity | 1.58x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Operating margin | 11.7% | US median 3.1% | ✓ |
Passes 2 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Concrete Pumping Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 1/2
| Measure | BBCP | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 2.17x | 2.00x published | ✓ |
| Long-term debt to working capital | 6.84x | 1.00x published | ✗ |
Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Concrete Pumping Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Joel Greenblatt 1/1
| Measure | BBCP | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed | 6.1% | US median 5.1% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Concrete Pumping Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 0/2
| Measure | BBCP | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | 1.58x | US median 0.57x | ✗ |
| Net margin | 1.8% | US median 2.0% | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Concrete Pumping Holdings’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 82.6% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | 303.1% | whyAfter maintaining the business. |
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.
Spread between highest and lowest: 220.5 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.
Coverage rating 25 / 100 — Strained. ? Peer standing 0/50Direction 15/30Stability 10/20
The arithmetic
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $53.1m ÷ operating cash flow $64.3m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $53.1m ÷ (operating cash flow $64.3m − capex $46.8m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-01-13 · accession 0001437749-26-001203
Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.
Caveats on this company
- DPS derived from dividends paid ($1.01); no per-share tag filed
- basis discarded as outside the sane band (distribution far larger than the year's income — usually a special dividend or a return of capital, not a payout ratio): earnings
Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.
What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated strained · when it files.
Who else looks like this
Every figure above is computed from Concrete Pumping Holdings’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.
A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one document — what that adds.