Ladder Capital
Through the investors’ lenses
2 of 3 cleared4 of 5 criteria
Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.
Warren Buffett 3/3
| Measure | LADR | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner earnings | $87.35m | positive | ✓ |
| Return on equity | 4.3% | US median 2.8% | ✓ |
| Debt to equity | — | US median 0.57x | — |
| Operating margin | 25.2% | US median 3.1% | ✓ |
Passes 3 of 3. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Ladder Capital’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Benjamin Graham 0/1
| Measure | LADR | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | — | 2.00x published | — |
| Long-term debt to working capital | — | 1.00x published | — |
| Positive earnings, ten years running | 5 yrs | 10 published | ✗ |
Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Ladder Capital’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Peter Lynch 1/1
| Measure | LADR | Checked against | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to equity | — | US median 0.57x | — |
| Net margin | 23.9% | US median 2.0% | ✓ |
Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Ladder Capital’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →
Funds from operations is not shown for this company. It cannot be computed from what this company files — the inputs are absent from its XBRL, not zero. The figure marked in the table is free cash flow instead.
| Basis | Payout | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 134.9% | whyBefore capital spending. |
| Free cash flow | 149.2% | whyCounts property acquisitions as though they were maintenance. |
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.
Spread between highest and lowest: 14.3 percentage points. Same filings, different denominators.
Coverage rating 22 / 100 — Strained. ? Peer standing 10/50Direction 0/30Stability 12/20
Free cash flow payout, last 6 years
| Fiscal year | Payout |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 149.2% |
| 2024-12-31 | 92.4% |
| 2023-12-31 | 66.1% |
| 2022-12-31 | 107.3% |
| 2021-12-31 | 134.3% |
| 2020-12-31 | 112.3% |
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 92.4% to 149.2%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.
20% of the 5 real estate here pay out more — at the demanding end.
The arithmetic
- Operating cash flow — dividends paid $117m ÷ operating cash flow $87.0m
- Free cash flow — dividends paid $117m ÷ (operating cash flow $87.0m − capex $8.34m)
Where the figures came from
- 10-K filed 2026-02-09 · accession 0001577670-26-000011
Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.
Caveats on this company
- FFO not derivable (no weighted-average diluted share count) — REIT page not publishable
Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.
What the free cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.
Also on: rated strained · when it files.
Who else looks like this
Every figure above is computed from Ladder Capital’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.
A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one document — what that adds.