showing the working

← Materials

MATW

Matthews International

Materials · fiscal year ending 2025-09-30

Through the investors’ lenses

1 of 4 cleared3 of 10 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 2/4
MeasureMATWChecked against
Owner earnings$11.46mpositive
Return on equity-5.1%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity1.48xUS median 0.57x
Operating margin5.0%US median 3.1%

Passes 2 of 4. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Matthews International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/3
MeasureMATWChecked against
Current ratio1.48x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital4.15x1.00x published
Positive earnings, ten years running0 yrs10 published

Passes 0 of 3. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Matthews International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureMATWChecked against
Return on capital employed6.3%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Matthews International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 0/2
MeasureMATWChecked against
Debt to equity1.48xUS median 0.57x
Net margin-1.6%US median 2.0%

Passes 0 of 2. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Matthews International’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

BasisPayoutWhy
GAAP earningsnegative
why
Lost $0.790 per share — no earnings to pay from.
Operating cash flownegative
why
Operations consumed $23.6m of cash.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $59.4m short of capex — the dividend was not funded from free cash flow.
Nothing is marked as applying, deliberately — no basis produces a ratio. Earnings, operating cash flow and free cash flow are all negative, so there is no denominator to divide the dividend by. That is not a gap in the data; it is the answer. The dividend was funded from something other than the money the business made this year — borrowing, cash on hand, or asset sales — and the filing will say which.

Coverage rating 6 / 100 — Not covered. ? Peer standing 6/50Direction 0/30Stability 0/20

Against its own history: 92.2% this year vs 27.4% median over the prior 5. A gap this size is usually a one-off — acquisition, settlement, cyclical trough — not a dividend that stopped being funded. The rating reads the latest year; the table shows the trend.

Free cash flow payout, last 6 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2024-09-3092.2%
2023-09-3097.5%
2022-09-3042.2%
2021-09-3021.6%
2020-09-3018.2%
2019-09-3027.4%

13% of the 47 materials here pay out more — at the demanding end.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

Also on: rated not covered · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Matthews International’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.