showing the working

← Utilities

SCE-PM

Southern California Edison

Utilities · fiscal year ending 2011-12-31

Through the investors’ lenses

1 of 4 cleared2 of 5 criteria

Each of these investors has said in public what they look at before buying. Click a name to see how this company measures up — a tick where it passes one of their tests, a cross where it does not.

Warren Buffett 1/2
MeasureSCE-PMChecked against
Owner earningspositive
Return on equity10.9%US median 2.8%
Debt to equity0.89xUS median 0.57x
Operating marginUS median 3.1%

Passes 1 of 2. These are the measures Warren Buffett published, applied to Southern California Edison’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Benjamin Graham 0/1
MeasureSCE-PMChecked against
Current ratio0.68x2.00x published
Long-term debt to working capital1.00x published

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Benjamin Graham published, applied to Southern California Edison’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Joel Greenblatt 1/1
MeasureSCE-PMChecked against
Return on capital employed11.3%US median 5.1%

Passes 1 of 1. These are the measures Joel Greenblatt published, applied to Southern California Edison’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Peter Lynch 0/1
MeasureSCE-PMChecked against
Debt to equity0.89xUS median 0.57x
Net marginUS median 2.0%

Passes 0 of 1. These are the measures Peter Lynch published, applied to Southern California Edison’s own figures — their criteria, not their view of this company. What he looks at, and why →

Last usable year: 2011-12-31 — 178 months ago. Nothing filed since gives the figures a payout ratio needs. For a company that once paid, that usually means it stopped.
GAAP earnings is not shown for this company. It cannot be computed from what this company files — the inputs are absent from its XBRL, not zero. The figure marked in the table is operating cash flow instead.
BasisPayoutWhy
Operating cash flow 14.1%
why
Before the capital programme the regulator expects.
Free cash flownegative
why
OCF fell $861m short of capex — normal for a utility funding its rate base.
No GAAP earnings figure is shown. This company does not report the inputs for it in its XBRL filings — capital expenditure, in particular, is often folded into a single investing total rather than tagged on its own. The figure is absent from the filings, not zero, and inventing one from a balance-sheet movement would be a guess dressed as a measurement.

Coverage rating 20 / 100 — Strained. ? Peer standing · not rankedDirection 10/30Stability 0/20

Operating cash flow payout, last 5 years

Fiscal yearPayout
2011-12-3114.1%
2010-12-315.9%
2009-12-317.4%
2008-12-3124.7%
2007-12-313.4%
Coverage worsened sharply this year, 5.9% to 14.1%, after no clear trend before it. One year is not a trend, but it is worth knowing which direction the last one moved.

The arithmetic

Where the figures came from

Every one is public at sec.gov and free to check. That is the point — you should not have to take our word for any of it.


Computed by an open pipeline reading SEC XBRL directly. If any number here looks wrong to you, tell us — that is more useful to us than agreement.

What the operating cash flow payout ratio measures, and where every company here sits on it.

Also on: rated strained · when it files.

Who else looks like this

Every figure above is computed from Southern California Edison’s own filing, and every company here is measured the same way. Screen all of them on any of these twelve measures, or on the rules four investors published — free, and nothing you screen leaves your browser.

Screen every company →

A subscription screens every company on this site at once, and turns a whole portfolio into one documentwhat that adds.